Composable ERP is a Flexible Innovation
A composable ERP strategy is gaining momentum. π
Uncertainty, tight budgets and innovation make them an attractive option. Iβve compared an integrated ERP with Composable ERP below. ππ½
The big mindset shift? Going from an a rigid all-in-one solution, to adding just what you need around a core ERP suite.
Hereβs some key differences:
MINDSET SHIFT
β Integrated: Unified solution with tightly integrated components.
β Composable: Flexible, modular approach with a mix of vendors, solutions, and technologies.
COST
β Integrated: Can be high due to dependence on a single vendor.
β Composable: Can lower costs by surrounding the core ERP with best-fit solutions and reducing dependence on a single vendor.
FLEXIBILITY
β Integrated: Limited. Dependent on a single vendor's roadmap.
β Composable: High. Can swap out technologies, applications, and vendors as needed.
CUSTOMISATION
β Integrated: Requires waiting for main releases or custom coding.
β Composable: Not limited by core vendor capabilities; can integrate best-fit products and services.
BUSINESS PROCESS ADOPTION
β Integrated: Often requires bending processes to fit software rules.
β Composable: Prioritizes business needs. Allows for optimization of unique environments.
INNOVATION
β Integrated: Potentially held back with "one-size-fits-none" nature.
β Composable: Encourages innovation. IT departments play an active role in selecting best-fit technologies.
IMPLEMENTATION
β Integrated: Easier out of the box.
β Composable: Can be longer due to various products and services.
What do you think?
Have you seen the shift towards a composable ERP strategy?
Get in touch to find out how I can help.