A composable ERP strategy is gaining momentum. 🚀

Uncertainty, tight budgets and innovation make them an attractive option. I’ve compared an integrated ERP with Composable ERP below. 👇🏽

The big mindset shift? Going from an a rigid all-in-one solution, to adding just what you need around a core ERP suite.

Here’s some key differences:

MINDSET SHIFT
→ Integrated: Unified solution with tightly integrated components.
→ Composable: Flexible, modular approach with a mix of vendors, solutions, and technologies.

COST
→ Integrated: Can be high due to dependence on a single vendor.
→ Composable: Can lower costs by surrounding the core ERP with best-fit solutions and reducing dependence on a single vendor.

FLEXIBILITY
→ Integrated: Limited. Dependent on a single vendor's roadmap.
→ Composable: High. Can swap out technologies, applications, and vendors as needed.

CUSTOMISATION
→ Integrated: Requires waiting for main releases or custom coding.
→ Composable: Not limited by core vendor capabilities; can integrate best-fit products and services.

BUSINESS PROCESS ADOPTION
→ Integrated: Often requires bending processes to fit software rules.
→ Composable: Prioritizes business needs. Allows for optimization of unique environments.

INNOVATION
→ Integrated: Potentially held back with "one-size-fits-none" nature.
→ Composable: Encourages innovation. IT departments play an active role in selecting best-fit technologies.

IMPLEMENTATION
→ Integrated: Easier out of the box.
→ Composable: Can be longer due to various products and services.

What do you think?

Have you seen the shift towards a composable ERP strategy?

Get in touch to find out how I can help.